under "Strategies for Casinos"--everyday play vs. once-every quarter
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2026 11:20 am
I don't know how to form the question I want to ask so I hope ya'll will help me pose it...
I live 20 minutes from the casino. I can visit it anytime any day for as long as I want (I'm retired with no obligations). I'm a "small-time" bettor. I buy in for $1020 and my usual play is $135 Across with a regression to $78/81 Across after two hits. My goal is to win 200-500 a session. If I'm having a seesaw day, I'll settle for $100-200, but if I catch a hand that puts me up $300 (no matter what my rack looked like before that hand), I'll usually color up. There've been days when I'll take down ALL my bets except the PL and shoot for the lone $10 or $15 PL bet, because the rack showed I was up $300 if I colored up right then; mind you, most of those times the session was a seesaw and in those times I was just happy to be (back,) up at my win-goal.
I've been welcomed by several different players and groups to join whenever they're in town. This has occurred 3-4 times in the last year (I've only been here for 18 months). I like playing with other acknowledged shooters and students but I've been lucky that the table has never been full and I've always been allowed an open slot. I don't feel the need to piggyback on all ya'lls game if the table's full because I can get to the tables anytime. But I've been welcomed and appreciate it very much. In this scenario, I feel a different "social duty" to adjust my limits--I'll play until "we all quit" or I'm pounded into the sand. I've hung around up to a $1400 loss (crapless; where I didn't know the game--but I had no resentments at all--now I'm REALLY tempted to try crapless again with an Outside favoring dice toss and the knowledge I paid for
). Playing with a full table has only worked out VERY well once; most of the time, I end up anywhere between -400 to +500. Tolerable; and I've always recovered if I was behind during those group games.
Whenever these groups play together they're only here for at most 5 days and they have to "get their sessions in" with an eye on their (theoretical) session buy-in limits and their "limited availability" 5-day net win-loss. So I understand that some shooters will press harder trying to win more, or, come back from a loss. AND stay because they're among "known" shooters.
When I'm on my own I've only stayed a few times beyond my normal (time or win goal) limit for my own hand because I thought I was too grooved to quit. As I said, most days when I'm alone, I'll play until I'm ahead 2-500 or down about 3-500. I've never been a player who can psychologically set my goal for more than a $500 win--when those come it's because some single long roll paid off or I hit a $100 Hardway bet. Realistically, I know my betting schemes aren't big enough to generate $500 with normal 10-15 roll hands as my long hands.
But my new strategical thinking is being influenced by the idea that I maybe should play on to see if the table is good and perservere during a good roll with more aggressive betting for bigger payoffs--but only after I've acheived the $300-a-day-profit-in-my pocket reserve.
For example, today I colored up $951 after tips. But I didn't cross the $300 goal until a $100 H4 paid off. When it did, I took everything down and went home. No chance to see if that groove I was in was "long-term" even though I felt pretty good today about my tosses. But the Chicken Little in me said I didn't wanna go home with $700 since I knew I'd be back again this week.
I don't have to make all my winnings in a 5-day visit. Should I just forego "aggression" and the possible big payday with $300 profit in my pocket already (but no spare in the rack), and quit as soon as I cross the $300 goal? I can play everyday and usually play at least 3x a week. My strategical goal is to win "about" $1000 a week; I just don't know how that jives with being more aggressive when the table's hot.
How would you play if you could get to a table 3x a week?
Thanks, Guys!
I live 20 minutes from the casino. I can visit it anytime any day for as long as I want (I'm retired with no obligations). I'm a "small-time" bettor. I buy in for $1020 and my usual play is $135 Across with a regression to $78/81 Across after two hits. My goal is to win 200-500 a session. If I'm having a seesaw day, I'll settle for $100-200, but if I catch a hand that puts me up $300 (no matter what my rack looked like before that hand), I'll usually color up. There've been days when I'll take down ALL my bets except the PL and shoot for the lone $10 or $15 PL bet, because the rack showed I was up $300 if I colored up right then; mind you, most of those times the session was a seesaw and in those times I was just happy to be (back,) up at my win-goal.
I've been welcomed by several different players and groups to join whenever they're in town. This has occurred 3-4 times in the last year (I've only been here for 18 months). I like playing with other acknowledged shooters and students but I've been lucky that the table has never been full and I've always been allowed an open slot. I don't feel the need to piggyback on all ya'lls game if the table's full because I can get to the tables anytime. But I've been welcomed and appreciate it very much. In this scenario, I feel a different "social duty" to adjust my limits--I'll play until "we all quit" or I'm pounded into the sand. I've hung around up to a $1400 loss (crapless; where I didn't know the game--but I had no resentments at all--now I'm REALLY tempted to try crapless again with an Outside favoring dice toss and the knowledge I paid for
Whenever these groups play together they're only here for at most 5 days and they have to "get their sessions in" with an eye on their (theoretical) session buy-in limits and their "limited availability" 5-day net win-loss. So I understand that some shooters will press harder trying to win more, or, come back from a loss. AND stay because they're among "known" shooters.
When I'm on my own I've only stayed a few times beyond my normal (time or win goal) limit for my own hand because I thought I was too grooved to quit. As I said, most days when I'm alone, I'll play until I'm ahead 2-500 or down about 3-500. I've never been a player who can psychologically set my goal for more than a $500 win--when those come it's because some single long roll paid off or I hit a $100 Hardway bet. Realistically, I know my betting schemes aren't big enough to generate $500 with normal 10-15 roll hands as my long hands.
But my new strategical thinking is being influenced by the idea that I maybe should play on to see if the table is good and perservere during a good roll with more aggressive betting for bigger payoffs--but only after I've acheived the $300-a-day-profit-in-my pocket reserve.
For example, today I colored up $951 after tips. But I didn't cross the $300 goal until a $100 H4 paid off. When it did, I took everything down and went home. No chance to see if that groove I was in was "long-term" even though I felt pretty good today about my tosses. But the Chicken Little in me said I didn't wanna go home with $700 since I knew I'd be back again this week.
I don't have to make all my winnings in a 5-day visit. Should I just forego "aggression" and the possible big payday with $300 profit in my pocket already (but no spare in the rack), and quit as soon as I cross the $300 goal? I can play everyday and usually play at least 3x a week. My strategical goal is to win "about" $1000 a week; I just don't know how that jives with being more aggressive when the table's hot.
How would you play if you could get to a table 3x a week?
Thanks, Guys!