Importance of Bankroll
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 11:28 pm
This is more of a vent, just for me to blow off some steam.
There are the obvious reasons why you want an adequate bankroll when you step up to the table, but I just found out one more reason. Let me regale you with my recent discovery.
Stayed at the table a little too long, but was only down $50, so I stayed even longer to only lose more. Broke one of my personal rules and went to the $25 table since it was empty. Had to go to a scaled down version of my betting strategy where I would not be able to put any odds on my line bet and do a doey-dont. Lost more. Eventually I had a nice roll. Had a fire bet, and made 4 points. Unfortunately, I didn't make any money since I couldn't capitalize on my passes since I did not have any odds. Now I knew this was a possibility since I couldn't put any odds. It was when I set the puck on the fifth number I then realized the one scenario I forgot about. Hedging. I looked down at my rack and did not have enough to make a "proper" don't odds bet against that 5th number. I didn't make that 5th number, but had I and set up the 6th, I could not make any hedge on that 6th.
When I begin each roll I always make sure I have enough to do my betting strategy, but never taken into account the extra amount I may have needed for a hedge bet. In the past (at lower min. tables) it wasn't a concern since 1) my usually betting strategy would natural put additional chips into my rack through place bets/odds. 2) there are other players that know me well enough that I would be able to "borrow" money.
So I guess the lesson learned is when you decide (or insist) on moving to a higher limit table, take into all scenarios that may arise.
There are the obvious reasons why you want an adequate bankroll when you step up to the table, but I just found out one more reason. Let me regale you with my recent discovery.
Stayed at the table a little too long, but was only down $50, so I stayed even longer to only lose more. Broke one of my personal rules and went to the $25 table since it was empty. Had to go to a scaled down version of my betting strategy where I would not be able to put any odds on my line bet and do a doey-dont. Lost more. Eventually I had a nice roll. Had a fire bet, and made 4 points. Unfortunately, I didn't make any money since I couldn't capitalize on my passes since I did not have any odds. Now I knew this was a possibility since I couldn't put any odds. It was when I set the puck on the fifth number I then realized the one scenario I forgot about. Hedging. I looked down at my rack and did not have enough to make a "proper" don't odds bet against that 5th number. I didn't make that 5th number, but had I and set up the 6th, I could not make any hedge on that 6th.
When I begin each roll I always make sure I have enough to do my betting strategy, but never taken into account the extra amount I may have needed for a hedge bet. In the past (at lower min. tables) it wasn't a concern since 1) my usually betting strategy would natural put additional chips into my rack through place bets/odds. 2) there are other players that know me well enough that I would be able to "borrow" money.
So I guess the lesson learned is when you decide (or insist) on moving to a higher limit table, take into all scenarios that may arise.