PL Bet After A Pass

[stratocasterman]

Ha! Correct.
And that's where the discussion of math becomes fuzzy.
I don't believe the intend of stratocasterman's post discounts your ..."Nope. AFTER"... comment. I read it as the math behind making consecutive passes from the initial ..."Before making ANY pass"...
Much like the math behind hand lengths - % of making a 10 roll hand, 20, 30, 40, etc. There is always a 1/6 change of tossing a seven.
I guess it's all perspective.
The question I ask, Is the math of one calculation, 16% vs 40%, more exact than the other one?

Best regards,
scout

My understanding was that my original posted figures were cumulative probability of randies...is that incorrect?

[House of Orange]

To quote Irish: Die thread, die!

[stratocasterman]

To quote Irish: Die thread, die!

Thanks a lot...

[Bankerdude80]

Yeah. What ever happened to showing your work. How can we ever expect to learn?

Oh, the humanity . . . somebody buy that Casino Math book I keep recommending. Come on. You can do it.

Which one would you recommend? Is the newer edition worth it?

CasinoMath (640x320).jpg (72.38 KiB) Viewed 10003 times

Is this one any good?

CasinoMath2 (640x164).jpg (57.46 KiB) Viewed 10003 times

[London Shooter]

Any seven, pays 4/1. Worst bet on the felt.

[London Shooter]

Well, as previously stated, 5/1 is break even at random so profitable in long run if skill/DI is exhibited. 6/1 is a great money maker on any old randie. You'd bet that all day.

Not sure what you fully mean by resolution rate here and its effect, but I'll take a stab on you having to be properly bankrolled as given you are betting something that only happens 1 in 6 times, there are going to be some eye watering losing runs. Therefore discipline, proper staking, money management are all going to be key to realising the true profit potential of such a good bet long term.

[SHOOTITALL]

Any seven, pays 4/1. Worst bet on the felt.

Actually LS I once saw a worser bet on the table. It was at the 4 Queens years ago and one of the dealers had "invented" a new bet that was actually on the layout. Basically, it was a hi/lo bet. You bet whether the shooter would throw greater than seven or less than seven.
So, the odds on that bet was 15/21 = 71% chance of a loss. It was gone the next time I was at the Queens a couple of months later. (I do not remember if the dealer was gone or not)

[heavy]

Makes me want to go find a Chuck-a-Luck game.

ChuckaLuck.jpg (42.2 KiB) Viewed 9955 times

Or maybe even some Sic Bo:

Sic_bo_Table.jpg (124.85 KiB) Viewed 9955 times

[Bankerdude80]

Which one would you recommend? Is the newer edition worth it?

The first.

Thanks. Found and ordered one for $40 (not bad).