wild child wrote: ↑Wed Aug 05, 2020 12:40 pm
The completed full A T S is a more-so greater % NON EVENT
than
actually successfully completing either only the SMALL or THE TALL.
Thus the non completed side of the equation either SMALL or TALL
along with the LARGER CARROT aka the "ALL"
are lost..................
Would the essentially BAD BET become a somewhat LESS-SO
were only the SMALL & the TALL GAMBLED
and
the ALL not gambled?
just me saying
w c
I guess we can debate the worthiness of the ATS if you want; however I'm sticking to my opinion that
for a DI this is a worthy pursuit.
The math on the bet for a randy is a different issue; I won't debate that.
If you know your DI data and have a SRR > 7 and/or RBS (Rolls Between Sevens) Average > 7+ why would you
NOT bet it? Let's break it down a bit - betting the Small and Tall costs $2 - and pays $31 (your original bet + $30); the All costs $1 to win $151. So that's about every fifteen tries to win $31. And, 150 tries on the ALL to win $151. So, you only need to hit them both once in ten, or thereabouts.
So, I'm going for it. And frankly, say its once every 200 tries to bag the All, then ok, after 150 tries, I'll press it to $2 per try. Yep, someone earlier on this thread (or another?) suggested a progressive betting strategy on the ATS & I think that sounds like a good play. More so, I'm keeping track of my ATS outlays - overall (since reopening) I'm ahead on the Small/Tall, while pending the All - with far less than 80 tries to date, though some are at $5 (the Bellagio minimum) which will get me to $150 faster, but also richer if I hit their ALL at $5 x 150.
So yeah, I see it as a profit opportunity for me, DN8R