Re: a 3 book experiment
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 4:25 pm
Book 4 of the 3 book field bet experiment is in. This is going to be called the bipolar book. The first half of the book was with a high trajectory shot (around 40 degrees) bouncing into the pyramids. The second half was made with a low trajectory shot trying to stay out of the pyramids. Huge difference in the results. I should also add that this book used the same dice as a previous book, and they are considerably less sharp as the earlier books (which all used new dice). Look at how different the results were.
...First half rolls 1-349...Second half 350-720
Set 66 on top 22 facing
Srr................6.58...........4.76
BSR...............4.53...........2.97
Both on axis.....41.55.........52.02
PFH...............10.32.........14.29
Single pitch......22.35.........22.10
DP..................8.88..........15.63
Left off........... 80.............75
Right off...........83 ............ 61
Both off............11.75 .........11.32
Field.......minus 18 units........minus 31 units
The one thing that was consistant was that they were both big losers on the field bet WTF?
I switched to the low trajectory to try to help the on axis % and hopefully get some field hits. I got a lot of DPs instead, although the on axis % was excellent. Thoughts? Comments?
...First half rolls 1-349...Second half 350-720
Set 66 on top 22 facing
Srr................6.58...........4.76
BSR...............4.53...........2.97
Both on axis.....41.55.........52.02
PFH...............10.32.........14.29
Single pitch......22.35.........22.10
DP..................8.88..........15.63
Left off........... 80.............75
Right off...........83 ............ 61
Both off............11.75 .........11.32
Field.......minus 18 units........minus 31 units
The one thing that was consistant was that they were both big losers on the field bet WTF?
I switched to the low trajectory to try to help the on axis % and hopefully get some field hits. I got a lot of DPs instead, although the on axis % was excellent. Thoughts? Comments?