bobthetree wrote:Nice to see a new member on the board, falcon! Welcome! Could we talk you into telling us a little about how you play? If you need to save the info for the book though, I understand.
Absolutely. I will start with what I believe are givens that drive my approach to the game. Some go against the "establishment" prevailing ways of standard play simply because, IMHO, they are absolutely wrong and lead to multiple losses which for the most part are unrecoverable during any given session.
1. Basing one's play on the "lowest" HA or "vig" is totally foolish in that those wagers are predicated on what I have deemed to be "fantasy" math. Therefore, the PL and Come, for me, are sucker bets which lure the player into dark places of mostly multiple losses especially after the point is established.
2. During any point there are only two numbers that can happen just once, i.e., the point or a 7.
3. During any given hour of play there will be at least two shooters that will have hands of from 10 to 15+ tosses.
4. After the point is established, there are always 30 ways to win and only six ways to lose.
5. While most here believe that you can not win by hedging, I say they really do not understand how to hedge properly.
6. There is no such thing as playing in the "long term" or playing for "expected" outcomes. Those are phantom entities used by the so-called "experts" to justify their fantasy math.
My play starts with the Doey/Don't minimum bets on the PL/DPL.
If the point is a 4,5,9, or 10, I place Don't Odds (no vig to the house and no mandatory minimum for the lay) starting at $30. I then Place $34 on the inside plus $1 each on the hard 4/10 and hop the easy 4/10 for $1 plus a $1 crap check. So for $39 I can win something on just about any given toss of the dice. The worst case scenario here is the shooter converts, and I lose $33 otherwise multiple hits and a 7 out provides me with a winning hand.
I am not foolish enough to believe I can do this every hand and expect to win, so I don't. I allow the table to dictate my play. It has to show me that there are shooters who can convert points, if not I continue to play the Don't/O and sometime w/o any other bets on board. A shooter who converts allows me to play strictly on the "right side" including the FO. Therefore, if the table is cold, I am there; a choppy table is tougher but doable with some restraint and discipline; and a "hot" shooter or table takes me a bit longer to jump on, but I do. There is more, but the basics are laid out here.
I always want to be in a dominant position with more ways to win than to lose such as: the point is a 6 or 8; I place Don't/O of $30 and play the hard way for $15. I now have 7 ways to win and four ways to lose, and BTW sometimes losing happens, but a $45 loss is recoverable.
One other thing, since 99.8% of shooters 7 out, I bring down my bets during a hand at times or reduce them when pressing after any given point conversion. I do not win big $$$, but I win, and those "small" wins add up. My last eight sessions each lasted between 2 - 3 hours+ and I lost only once for a whopping $140 otherwise I am up a nice sum.
falcon
p.s. Like the DI's, I practice everyday on my computer using SIM craps, not for simulations of millions of rolls, but on a point by point, roll by roll basis, you know, the short term play.