Re: Rappin' Captain's Exponential Betting
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2018 10:40 pm
Thx Heavy/sputnik et al for your prompt response to my question above.
I thought RC continued with the incremental increases but wasn't sure. RC tweaked a few things in the latter part of his dice career /as mentioned above added several other levels. Many thanks to Americraps as much of my info on RCs' wagering approach came from americraps extensive testing/writings and back-and-forth discussions with RC on the D institute site.
A few commandments I remember RC seemed adamant about and mentioned in several posts was:
1)Do NOT work odds on comeout til you cover >=4 numbers. So if for example you're covering (#s 4,5,6) then you're OFF on the come out. If your covering (#s 4,5,6, and 8) or more then you're ON for the come out.
2)Do not skip, stutter, or stop with the press levels. IMO this is very important because as you know at or near that 5th increase the exponential compounding is really taking off and your growth curve really starts its upward angle. Any previous drawdown gets swamped. Especially on the hands that get into the >=5-12th press. I see quite a few 5-7 but seldom get to 11th..etc territory
3) RC felt the increases needed to stay at or slightly above 20%. He spoke several times that pressing too much can be as detrimental as too little.
RC mentioned several times the 20% increase was too much for 6/8 payouts because the payout is not sufficiently above the base bet. However, IMO this gets averaged out by the higher payouts from the other numbers. The majority of sessions I track will see the 5 or 9 out pace at least one of the 6or8s.
I use a similar exponential system except I don't try to cover all the numbers. After the point is established I cover that number and place an inside number for same amount(I choose the initial Place # from charting/tracking).
IMO Its difficult to use place bets below $60 amount. I prefer not to have the 6/8 as my first two numbers and will choose the optimum 5or9 based on tracking or what I'm hitting that session. After the second number is rolled(providing not a 2,3,11,12) I will cover the third number. I do not cover any additional numbers(even though I'm continuing with come bets but no odds), until I've received >=two payouts.
My largest win and highest ROI came from utilizing three of the inside numbers.
* As a side note I also use an exponential wagering approach on flat bets (DC and PL), as well as in Baccarat. Though IMO the above 20% is too aggressive for flat bets. On flat bets I prefer to use a smoother-curved progression based on some work by mathematician(Euler--pronounced like Oy-ler), utilizing the number E (2.71) and the natural logarithm of 1.
Thanks everyone and hope you have a healthy/wealthy year.
Tgold
I thought RC continued with the incremental increases but wasn't sure. RC tweaked a few things in the latter part of his dice career /as mentioned above added several other levels. Many thanks to Americraps as much of my info on RCs' wagering approach came from americraps extensive testing/writings and back-and-forth discussions with RC on the D institute site.
A few commandments I remember RC seemed adamant about and mentioned in several posts was:
1)Do NOT work odds on comeout til you cover >=4 numbers. So if for example you're covering (#s 4,5,6) then you're OFF on the come out. If your covering (#s 4,5,6, and 8) or more then you're ON for the come out.
2)Do not skip, stutter, or stop with the press levels. IMO this is very important because as you know at or near that 5th increase the exponential compounding is really taking off and your growth curve really starts its upward angle. Any previous drawdown gets swamped. Especially on the hands that get into the >=5-12th press. I see quite a few 5-7 but seldom get to 11th..etc territory
3) RC felt the increases needed to stay at or slightly above 20%. He spoke several times that pressing too much can be as detrimental as too little.
RC mentioned several times the 20% increase was too much for 6/8 payouts because the payout is not sufficiently above the base bet. However, IMO this gets averaged out by the higher payouts from the other numbers. The majority of sessions I track will see the 5 or 9 out pace at least one of the 6or8s.
I use a similar exponential system except I don't try to cover all the numbers. After the point is established I cover that number and place an inside number for same amount(I choose the initial Place # from charting/tracking).
IMO Its difficult to use place bets below $60 amount. I prefer not to have the 6/8 as my first two numbers and will choose the optimum 5or9 based on tracking or what I'm hitting that session. After the second number is rolled(providing not a 2,3,11,12) I will cover the third number. I do not cover any additional numbers(even though I'm continuing with come bets but no odds), until I've received >=two payouts.
My largest win and highest ROI came from utilizing three of the inside numbers.
* As a side note I also use an exponential wagering approach on flat bets (DC and PL), as well as in Baccarat. Though IMO the above 20% is too aggressive for flat bets. On flat bets I prefer to use a smoother-curved progression based on some work by mathematician(Euler--pronounced like Oy-ler), utilizing the number E (2.71) and the natural logarithm of 1.
Thanks everyone and hope you have a healthy/wealthy year.
Tgold